Auckland Meeting
Summary
- There are 8 posts — by 7 authors — in this topic.
- Latest post made by Glen Barnes at 2010 Aug 09 15:57 NZST
Had an interesting meeting tonight. One theme was the availability of transit data - that is the real time feeds from buses and ferries. On arrival we didn't really know what was happening, but we soon had some good news - that the data will be made available. Another theme was licensing - especially around commercial use restrictions, and what "commercial" meant. This is a general problem with CC licenses. We talked about risks and liabilities when it comes to providing data that is incorrect. There was some discussion about how the Super City will effect Open Data; mostly a rather glum analysis, but again with some good news on the horizon. I would like to make a comment however about entitlement. It may be true that as tax payer and rate payers we have already have paid for collected data, and there are legal requirements that data and information is made available. However, let us not beat those working in Government and Council over the head with the legislation or take a attitude of entitlement to data delivery. I would rather foster a robust atmosphere of willing cooperation than a culture of resentful fulfillment of duty. There are many in Government that share our desire to see data increasingly opened. Many are on this list of course. Unlike Open Source, which potentially can be simply handed over to a community (although hardly ideal), Open Data creates an ongoing obligation to maintain and update data. There is however great scope for open data to minimize costs of manual processes and have other very real business advantages. It has been a long week - and it's only Wednesday :) Good to see everyone, and I look forward to meeting again soonish.
Agree, good meeting tonight. Thanks to Glen for kicking it off. The transit data is of interest to me given how locked up Auckland has become with congestion, - see better transport <http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/> .
Regards Jennifer -----Original Message----- From: <email obscured> <email obscured>] On Behalf Of Peter Harrison Sent: Wednesday, 4 August 2010 10:46 p.m. To: ninja-talk Subject: [ninjas] Auckland Meeting Had an interesting meeting tonight. One theme was the availability of transit data - that is the real time feeds from buses and ferries. On arrival we didn't really know what was happening, but we soon had some good news - that the data will be made available. Another theme was licensing - especially around commercial use restrictions, and what "commercial" meant. This is a general problem with CC licenses. We talked about risks and liabilities when it comes to providing data that is incorrect. There was some discussion about how the Super City will effect Open Data; mostly a rather glum analysis, but again with some good news on the horizon. I would like to make a comment however about entitlement. It may be true that as tax payer and rate payers we have already have paid for collected data, and there are legal requirements that data and information is made available. However, let us not beat those working in Government and Council over the head with the legislation or take a attitude of entitlement to data delivery. I would rather foster a robust atmosphere of willing cooperation than a culture of resentful fulfillment of duty. There are many in Government that share our desire to see data increasingly opened. Many are on this list of course. Unlike Open Source, which potentially can be simply handed over to a community (although hardly ideal), Open Data creates an ongoing obligation to maintain and update data. There is however great scope for open data to minimize costs of manual processes and have other very real business advantages. It has been a long week - and it's only Wednesday :) Good to see everyone, and I look forward to meeting again soonish. ----------------------------------------- Full text of this topic in The Open Government Ninjas: http://groups.open.org.nz/r/topic/3vc21Pu84kjAGRUD2dYIsa To leave The Open Government Ninjas, email <email obscured>?Subject=unsubscribe Start your own free groups and site with OnlineGroups.Net http://onlinegroups.net Host your own online groups site with GroupServer http://groupserver.org No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3030 - Release Date: 08/04/10 16:45:00
On 4/08/10 10:46 PM, Peter Harrison wrote: > I would like to make a comment however about entitlement. It may be > true that as tax payer and rate payers we have already have paid for > collected data, and there are legal requirements that data and > information is made available. However, let us not beat those working > in Government and Council over the head with the legislation or take a > attitude of entitlement to data delivery. > This is a bloody good point and bears repeating on regular occasions. The OIA/LGOIA is not a blunt instrument, or the only way to get data. Networking, making contact and generally behaving decently to people will get you far more than demanding.
Cheers ~mark
Yes a good meeting for the Auckland Ninjas. I was interested to see the sources of some of the conflicts. As I see it there are two forces. 1. We want the data to be available, timely, accurate, with metadata, clearly licensed, etc. These are quality issues and things like the threat of liability make providers want to hold onto data until all the quality issues are worked out. 2. We want the data to be available, now, in a simple common format, good enough to get started, interesting, unencumbered These are value and opportunity issues. Potential exploratory developers (AKA hackers) want to play (this is a good thing) to investigate what could be done with data. Hence we have the conflict between the 'why can't you just put a file on a server' and 'we need to provide a 24/7 SLA high availability online real time data service' Both are correct of course and one leads naturally into the other. I like the way Creative Commons have made it a lot easier to say what you mean when it comes to copyright. Perhaps we need a similar set of off the shelf Service level Agreements, or quality statements that allow us to say clearly that this is an 'as is' | 'nationally significant' data set, updated 'when i feel like it' | 'every 5 minutes', and usable 'by anyone' | 'for a fee'. I think the 'commercial use' issue is arse about face. It is really the commercial user rather than the supplier who needs to obtain a clear understanding about the data. If I supply a nice online service - say telling you the UV levels around the country, for free you might build an iphone app for it and we are all happy. However if your customers are going to expect the data to continue to arrive and are paying you for that, but you don't have any continuity of supply agreement with us then thats bad business. You are going to want to come to us asking for an improved SLA for which service I would presume you would be willing to pay. The level of error in the data that is acceptable also depends rather on the use to which it is put i.e context. So again it is the user who should determine what quality they want and are prepared to pay for. Both quality control and service continuity cost money even if the original data is 'free'. The final lesson - don't try to negotiate with inebriated transport officials.
Hi Andrew (and the rest of the replies), Thanks for the writeup. You pretty much said what I wanted to say so +1 to your comments. The funny thing is I am normally the one championing working with departments to launch projects and get things off the ground but for some reason I seemed to come across as unreasonable last night (inebriated transport official aside). I'm all for a robust system that supports professionals (aka the http://maps.auckland.govt.nz/ site) but the real interest for me lies in all of the other uses of the data. Sure we need super accurate data for those doing planning and digging drains but the fact that some of the data isn't critical shouldn't stop some data from being released on an as-is where-is basis. I'm also confused about not being able to use cloud services to reduce distribution costs. Amazon s3 is no different from hosting it on your own hard drive but without the same hardware costs. The data still comes with the same license restrictions and can still have the requirement of a click-wrap agreement. I would be keen to investigate this issue further. I think your commercial use description is apt as well. I'm not going to invest large amounts of money on data that doesn't have some form of consistency but at the same time I may start down the track, build a demo and if gains traction then look for some form of SLA. Of course at this point I should be able to afford that enhanced service since people are using my service. As a hacker I'm not going to spend hundreds or thousands of dollars just to play with something and hopefully come up with something cool. The real time bus info is a great case - I will be happy to be rate limited to some reasonable amount that will let me grab the data I need to build an iPhone app or a lower volume website but I would think I might have to pay for larger drains on the server. Over time that cost should come down as bandwidth becomes cheaper. We also need to explore the commercial use items from a licensing standpoint. "Just use the rateable values and scrape the data" is not something that my bosses at Zoodle would be comfortable with. Before I go anywhere near that route I would want a clear ruling on whether that was allowed. It is clearly against the terms of use, copyright and license agreements. This to me is critical to fostering innovation in the apps space (using the data for consulting seems to be OK) Anyway - Good to meet people last night. I actually am reasonable OK to work with ;-)
Thanks, Glen On 5/08/2010, at 9:25 AM, Andrew Watkins wrote: > Yes a good meeting for the Auckland Ninjas. > > I was interested to see the sources of some of the conflicts. As I > see it there are two forces. > 1. We want the data to be available, timely, accurate, with metadata, > clearly licensed, etc. > These are quality issues and things like the threat of liability make > providers want to hold onto data until all the quality issues are > worked out. > > 2. We want the data to be available, now, in a simple common format, > good enough to get started, interesting, unencumbered > These are value and opportunity issues. Potential exploratory > developers (AKA hackers) want to play (this is a good thing) to > investigate what could be done with data. > > Hence we have the conflict between the 'why can't you just put a file > on a server' and 'we need to provide a 24/7 SLA high availability > online real time data service' > > Both are correct of course and one leads naturally into the other. > > I like the way Creative Commons have made it a lot easier to say what > you mean when it comes to copyright. Perhaps we need a similar set > of off the shelf Service level Agreements, or quality statements that > allow us to say clearly that this is an 'as is' | 'nationally > significant' data set, updated 'when i feel like it' | 'every 5 > minutes', and usable 'by anyone' | 'for a fee'. > > I think the 'commercial use' issue is arse about face. It is really > the commercial user rather than the supplier who needs to obtain a > clear understanding about the data. If I supply a nice online service > - say telling you the UV levels around the country, for free you might > build an iphone app for it and we are all happy. > > However if your customers are going to expect the data to continue to > arrive and are paying you for that, but you don't have any continuity > of supply agreement with us then thats bad business. You are going to > want to come to us asking for an improved SLA for which service I > would presume you would be willing to pay. > > The level of error in the data that is acceptable also depends rather > on the use to which it is put i.e context. So again it is the user > who should determine what quality they want and are prepared to pay > for. > > Both quality control and service continuity cost money even if the > original data is 'free'. > > The final lesson - don't try to negotiate with inebriated transport officials. > > ----------------------------------------- > Full text of this topic in The Open Government Ninjas: > http://groups.open.org.nz/r/topic/3dIG7Sv0oQUgMnuT1DEhOO > > To leave The Open Government Ninjas, email > <email obscured>?Subject=unsubscribe > > Start your own free groups and site with > OnlineGroups.Net http://onlinegroups.net > > Host your own online groups site with > GroupServer http://groupserver.org
On 5 August 2010 10:00, Glen Barnes <email obscured>> wrote: > I'm also confused about not being able to use cloud services to reduce > distribution costs. Amazon s3 is no different from hosting it on your own > hard drive but without the same hardware costs. Well, until recently it was just plain illegal (for a government department anyway, not sure about local government). I think the recent update to the Public Finance Act regulations would cover Amazon s3 though: http://blog.e.govt.nz/index.php/2010/03/08/amendment-to-the-public-finance-act-regulations-web-20/
Gordon
It was good to meet you all the other night. One of the topics I'd been keen to discuss but which we didn't seem to get round to is whether anyone would be interested in helping to organise a citycamp in Auckland. The citycamp is supposed to be a "dynamic unconference covering local Gov 2.0, transparency, participation, and open source." There's an idea floating that there should be a citycamp world tour and I've put my hand up to help organise one here if there's enough interest. More info about the initial DC version at the following link - http://barcamp.pbworks.com/CityCampDC Moving in to the new council it would be really interesting to talk about these issues and what could be improved on. Obviously it would be good to give the new organisation time to settle down and we'd need time to be able to identify key officers to get involved. Would anyone else be interested in helping organise this?
I'm keen to come along and participate but I don't think I have the time right now to organise things. I think we need some involvement from council to really get things moving. Glen On 6/08/2010, at 4:42 PM, carol.hayward wrote: > It was good to meet you all the other night. > > One of the topics I'd been keen to discuss but which we didn't seem to get round to is whether anyone would be interested in helping to organise a citycamp in Auckland. > > The citycamp is supposed to be a "dynamic unconference covering local Gov 2.0, transparency, participation, and open source." There's an idea floating that there should be a citycamp world tour and I've put my hand up to help organise one here if there's enough interest. > > More info about the initial DC version at the following link - http://barcamp.pbworks.com/CityCampDC > > Moving in to the new council it would be really interesting to talk about these issues and what could be improved on. Obviously it would be good to give the new organisation time to settle down and we'd need time to be able to identify key officers to get involved.
> > Would anyone else be interested in helping organise this? > ----------------------------------------- > Full text of this topic in The Open Government Ninjas: > http://groups.open.org.nz/r/topic/4OgzCNyqtCfZRCG64G3kkt > > To leave The Open Government Ninjas, email > <email obscured>?Subject=unsubscribe > > Start your own free groups and site with > OnlineGroups.Net http://onlinegroups.net > > Host your own online groups site with > GroupServer http://groupserver.org
Loading…
Privacy | Acceptable Use | Terms of Service | About OnlineGroups.Net | Contact OnlineGroups.Net
Start an OnlineGroups.Net site for easier email collaboration in your organization.
Powered by GroupServer, the open source web-based mailing list manager.
